Free Essays on Indian Removal Act

People dying from starvation and being forced off of land that is theirs. Does this seem fair? Well in my opinion it’s not. Sure the government says, â€Å"we bought the land and it’s ours†, but it was the Cherokee’s first. As we all know President Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act. A reason it was set forth is because the government says, â€Å"we need these lands to expand the nation†. Also, the government says, the act was made because, â€Å"the land has been ours to begin with†. Has the government even given a second thought to all of the costs of this act? I bet they have not. Well first of all, there is the fact that through the Trail of Tears many Cherokee Indians died, just because President Jackson wanted the land. Also, doing this could cut-off trade between the Indian tribes and the white settlers. All the Indians did was try to live in harmony and the white settlers had to disturb the peace. Also, President Jackson was almost killed in one raid. The White settlers were so stubborn, because they always have to get what they want, so they raided Indian villages. This killed many innocent Native Americans and it is truly wrong. Now some benefits. Well, I suppose, a benefit would be more land for the United States to expand on. Also, the Native Americans will now have land all to themselves, but will have to pay a terrible price to get it. I would say a last benefit would be that America did get what they wanted and that was all Indian lands. In my opinion, many core Democratic values were overlooked in this situation. Such as, equality. Equality means, we are all equals. The Cherokee’s should have been treated as equals. They are just like everyone else. Also, the Cherokee’s individual rights were overlooked. They have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and in this case they were not given that. There are alternatives that could have been used in place of the Indi... Free Essays on Indian Removal Act Free Essays on Indian Removal Act People dying from starvation and being forced off of land that is theirs. Does this seem fair? Well in my opinion it’s not. Sure the government says, â€Å"we bought the land and it’s ours†, but it was the Cherokee’s first. As we all know President Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act. A reason it was set forth is because the government says, â€Å"we need these lands to expand the nation†. Also, the government says, the act was made because, â€Å"the land has been ours to begin with†. Has the government even given a second thought to all of the costs of this act? I bet they have not. Well first of all, there is the fact that through the Trail of Tears many Cherokee Indians died, just because President Jackson wanted the land. Also, doing this could cut-off trade between the Indian tribes and the white settlers. All the Indians did was try to live in harmony and the white settlers had to disturb the peace. Also, President Jackson was almost killed in one raid. The White settlers were so stubborn, because they always have to get what they want, so they raided Indian villages. This killed many innocent Native Americans and it is truly wrong. Now some benefits. Well, I suppose, a benefit would be more land for the United States to expand on. Also, the Native Americans will now have land all to themselves, but will have to pay a terrible price to get it. I would say a last benefit would be that America did get what they wanted and that was all Indian lands. In my opinion, many core Democratic values were overlooked in this situation. Such as, equality. Equality means, we are all equals. The Cherokee’s should have been treated as equals. They are just like everyone else. Also, the Cherokee’s individual rights were overlooked. They have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and in this case they were not given that. There are alternatives that could have been used in place of the Indi... Free Essays on Indian Removal Act â€Å"The Indian Problem† In the beginning, native peoples occupied the lands that would one day become the United States of America. How they arrived there is the subject of discussion among experts. They came more than 20,000 years ago, and by 1492 AD, they had established patterns of society. Those of the Northeastern woods, known as the Five Nations, had established dominion over an area running from Maine to Kansas to South Carolina. The Indians of the Plains had each carved out their own territories, which they maintained by peaceful resolutions with each other. The people of the Southwest, in Arizona and New Mexico had two cultures, one nomadic and one for farming. There is no history of war, battle, even fighting during this point in history, among these people. Then the white man arrived. European settlers took over the Indian land like an unexpected plague. They found the Native Americans to be savages, in need of learning and dignity and unsuitable to live among, so they began pushing the Indians w est, making room for the settlers coming in from overseas. Among those that were being pushed out of their homes, were the Iroquois of the Northeast and the Plains Indians of the West, and they reacted†¦ Plains Indians -The Sioux- Made famous in the film ‘Dances With Wolves’, the Sioux, meaning a large group of Native Americans speaking the same language, were the dominant tribe in the high plains of America. They were often divided into three groups; the Lakota, the Cheyenne and the Oglala Sioux. They were a nomadic people who hunted the buffalo that roamed the high plains. They were excellent horseman and hunters, swift and efficient. The buffalo, seen as a sacred being, provided the Sioux with food, clothing, the coverings for their teepee homes, and the raw material for many of their tools. The Sioux were a very peaceful people, yet, if occasion called for it, could become formidable warriors. -The Cheyenne- Originally...